Lesson 03 of 4 in Module 04
⏱️ 02 Mins readHardware, time, and proportionality
Running a model on your machine costs RAM (system memory) and often VRAM (GPU memory). Bigger models generally need more of both. For a static HTML course, proportionality matters: you are not training a national AI; you are helping one site ship.
Do this — read your machine (5 minutes)
Without installing AI, complete:
- RAM: How many GB does your system report? (macOS: About This Mac; Windows: Settings → System → About; Linux:
free -hif you know how.) - GPU: Do you know if you have a discrete GPU with VRAM, or only integrated graphics? “Unknown” is a valid answer—write unknown.
Write two lines:
- RAM: ___ GB
- GPU note: ___
Concept — rule of thumb (high level)
- Smaller models (roughly “few billion parameters” in common talk) can sometimes run on CPU-only or modest laptops—slowly.
- Larger models want more VRAM and fast GPUs.
- Start small for learning; measure latency; upgrade only if you truly need quality.
Exact numbers change with quantisation and software—do not memorise a chart from this lesson. Memorise the process: match model to hardware, not ego to leaderboard.
Do this — proportionality paragraph (10 minutes)
Scenario: You need one landing page + contact email for a hobby. You have no enterprise budget.
Write 6–8 sentences that answer:
- Is downloading a huge flagship model proportionate? Why or why not?
- What would Satisfactory judgement look like for a tool choice here? (Plain language: enough quality, not maximum hype.)
- What would Not Satisfactory look like? (Example: “spent a week tuning a cluster while the page is still empty.”)
This is practice in justifying tool choice for the job.
Check
- Your paragraph mentions time or hardware at least once.
- You avoided “always use the biggest model” as advice.
Key takeaways
- Bigger ≠ better for a tiny static site.
- Proportionality is a professional skill—especially for S/NS assessment language in this course.
- If local is too slow to be useful, cloud or smaller models are rational, not failure.